If you insist using the proper name, consider that using Search and linking in edit depend on writing the right names. If you want to rename, I must insist you edit every link on this site.--Kuopiofi (talk) 21:36, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
Please use signature (button on top, fifth from right, looks like writing), makes it so much easier to know who wrote and answer.
We have similar power... I just can't remember the name. Picture was someone using wand to open door.--Kuopiofi (talk) 17:34, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
Completely different than PVA, I run into it sometime last week; didn't honestly think much about it, but it was bit on the longer side. I don't really remember that much about it, but it was definitely the same idea what you used for M-RP. --Kuopiofi (talk) 18:10, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
I'll try to remember, it keeps bugging me now... --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:12, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
I think I found it and added Item-category on it. Honestly, there's been so much to do that I can't be absolutely certain, but that's the fastest way to check it. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:33, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
Signature, please. It's so much easier to answer.
As it was, there's no way that could be considered a power. Circumstance at best. --Kuopiofi (talk) 21:04, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't have more to do with the fact that they are main characters than anything else? In other words, it's about the story's needs instead of the individual. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:36, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
I think that's way overspecialized, we don't even have general one for natural attack-form. --Kuopiofi (talk) 05:51, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
Well, to be frank we do have quite a few very specialized weapon-pages, so claiming tail would be that different would be a bit hypocritical. What I mean that we don't have a page like Weapon Proficiency (which collects various weapon proficiencies) to give a umbrella-page for wielding Natural Weaponry with proficiency. --Kuopiofi (talk) 20:14, November 2, 2013 (UTC)