Because most of it was just copied and pasted from Omnipotence and there is nothing above Omnipotence. It is not Omnipotence if there is something that can transcend above it.Besides, I think there is enough "versions" of Omnipotence as it is Gabriel456 (talk) 21:26, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
friend, with all due respect
you created the power?
Tell me about the omnipotent hand, What she transcends? what is its nature?
I enjoyed this power, so I want to know
Hey CoolBat ^ ^ There's a big post of mine about various TV tropes pages waiting for you on the Alpha Physiology page when you'll have some time, if you wish to answer of course. DYBAD (talk) 20:55, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
For Science ! ^ ^
Life Aspect Manifestation
From personal experience I can say that it's so easy to go overly verbose when you get interested about the subject, so you're welcome.
Try to take a step back after you've written something and consider how someone else who isn't really that interested would see it, and especially if it is so long that they don't even bother reading; there's a reason why we keep breaking, shortening or removing the walls of text when they appear. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
Death Aspect Manifestation
hey buddy, remember the power that you created and deleted: Almighty hand
tell me the theory where did you get that, I need, the philosophical theory, pass me the link
What the theory
A compromise between power, balance and long-term fun. Enjoy ^ ^
Just So I Know
Hey CoolCat, do you by any chance have a YouTube account?
I need advice
Minerva's War God Magic
Hey, I am planning to make a power based on Minerva's War God Magic (Fairy Tail) but I am trying to understand the magic.
All I understand is the applications to Minerva's magic is that is can remotely teleport any object or oneself.
Sap away at one's magical energy.
Summon a giant six armed monster.
She even says it's some sort of territorial magic.
If you're interested
I was just doing a favor or what not. But here's a story of an AU Harry Potter. Just check it and give a chance. Sorry if I look like some dude selling a product. But I can't help it right now. Chaw! Addikhabbo (talk) 03:35, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
Answering this will get you additional questions.
If you were given in a situation, involving 500 passengers of two ships, 300 on 1 and 200 on the other, both sinking, and you had time to save only one, which would you save?
Your only options are to pick a boat to save. You don't have time to transfer passengers from one boat to another. Doing so will cause further death.
State your reason.
After saving 300 passengers on Boat A, the situation repeats itself and people transfer to lifeboats, 200 on L 1 and 100 on L 2. You can only save one L.
Again, you can't choose something other than the option given to you, as taking a 3rd option will result in increasing casualties.
If you've figured out the logic between my questions, give them to me.
If you keep editing various Elemental Manipulations Limitations, I must insist you do the same change on all EM pages. I'm not interested going through the annoyance myself, so if you start chancing the given form, please do all the same way. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:20, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
Hi ! May I ask your help for the Capability section of the QM page ? You're clearly the most skilled of us in this area, and I'm sure you could bring to light the power's inherent awesomeness (sorely underrated since its creation). DYBAD (talk) 01:45, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year
- "Happy New Year! Today 2 person ask me about u. I gave them your details and contact. They will b looking 4 u soon. Their names are Mr HAPPINESS and Ms LUCK. Happy New Year! "
Hi CoolCat ! I have a question for a scientific mind : what is causality beyond the abstract theory ? I know what Probability Manipulation is like in practice, it essentially "pushes" existing phenomena into one specific path among all those it could take, but I have a much harder time to picture Causality Manipulation from an empirical viewpoint. Could you help me try to sort out this enigma ? DYBAD (talk) 03:07, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
Given his completely unreasonable, logic proof, uncompromising, and idiotically offensive behaviour, I suspect more and more that he is a troll having a go with us and this wiki. Would you like to ask the admins to ban him, as he is getting extremely tiresome to have to deal with, and I think they would listen more to a massive contributor suçh as yourself. Antvasima (talk) 06:26, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
It is the relentless unreasonable crude language trolling that gets to me. But if you suspect that he uses multiple identities, perhaps you should make it known to the admins? Antvasima (talk) 04:51, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
I want the admin to ban you to Antvasima but I aint Disrespectful like you and yeah I have another account ._. Soooo what? Haven't edit on this wiki in a long time with that account so please if you have a direct problem then talk to me about it k? Beyonder (talk) 06:06, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Yes you have been relentlessly wantonly crude language trolling, unreasonable, and insulting. It is easy to see this in your past posts, and I am not the only one who thinks so. If you stop being in your face provocative against me I have no problem with you however. Antvasima (talk) 08:28, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for being a jerk to you the other day. Was too -condition here- for an argument and didn't get any sleep. My bad. Shouldn't have gotten angry at you. Addikhabbo (talk) 11:35, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
I didn't really want to get into this, but I locked the page, just until you two reach an agreement. But I probably won't be on much longer (near-midnight for me), so you'll have to rely on Kuopiofi. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:32, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
Reminder to both
Apparently it must be repeated every time someone starts argument about OP: keep it on Talk/Forum/whatever, don't go chancing the page repeatedly over the same thing. It's right on the rules and repeated several times on OP's Comments
I'm seriously starting to think making this block-worthy rule for repeat offenders, it's getting so annoying.
And please, for the sake of my blood-pressure and mental health, try to figure it out like thinking/rational beings between yourself instead of drawing other people to this. In other words, don't contact me until you've find agreement and hold to it, I'm getting so sick/tired about this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
It happens to everyone, this OP-argument just seems to have drawn the most passionate responses in a long time... don't know if it's BG, the power in question (OP has caused a row few times) or just something that's been waiting to happen and this was the opening to it, or all at once. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:22, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
Even if I agreed, I can't. I'm not a bureaucrat (or whatever the term is). Neither is Kuopiofi. The only one that is was Kingsman, but he hasn't been on for atleast a year Gabriel456 (talk) 01:13, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
I wouldn't be so quick to wish him good luck with it, as he in no way or form has any good intentions. He strictly seems to have created it to piss lots of people off by posting extremely inaccurate information about various characters, literally laughingly gloat about being able to get away with plagiarising the real OBD and lie about being the original owner, and to promote his namesake favourite character. He never ever listens to proof or reason, and would rather edit war indefinitely. He said that he considers it acceptable to level death threats against me. Antvasima (talk) 05:09, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate Monkey D. Garp's strength that was cultivated without the use of a Devil Fruit or magic, but by his own will and the abilities that are naturally available to him as a human.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 12:45, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Nuclear fission and law of conservation
Hey CoolCat ! I was wondering about the relation between the massive energy produced by nuclear fission and the conservation of mass/energy. I mean, if the breaking of such minuscule things can produce such great quantities of energy, isn't this law of conservation kind of violated somehow? DYBAD (talk) 03:56, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
So basically, nuclear fission doesn't violate the conservation of mass/energy, but simply illustrates the extremely unbalanced ratio mass/energy ratio, microscopic amounts of mass effectively holding enormous amounts of energy. Correct ? DYBAD (talk) 08:40, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
So every human being is basically a nuclear bomb in waiting ? Nice ! The guy who eventually finds the button would have the entire world in the palm of his hand. I'm sure it would make for an awesome movie about the dangers of science and human responsability, on a background of terrorist threat and power play. Just like the original nuclear bomb, but with 7 billions walking bombs all over the world waiting the right signal. Blockbuster material here ! I wish there was a site to suggest movie scenarios to potential producers ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 15:37, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
Well, the Lucy 2014 movies was a huge success despite being entirely built on completely incorrect theory (even the producer openly acknowledges it), so I'm sure a "humans turned into walking nuclear bombs via a modified fission process" scenario would have the audience jumping in without a second thought, especially considering the real-life nuclear threat and human bombs terrorism. DYBAD (talk) 01:43, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Funny though how Lucy threw both realism (100% brain capacity) and balance (unlimited superpowers) out the window, and still became a huge success. I get the feeling most people just want to dream when they go watch a movie. DYBAD (talk) 02:29, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
The Lucy movie is actually a strange combination of good and bad. On the good, Lucy's exponentially awesome abilities. On the bad side, the nonesensical basis repeated at least a dozen times (atomizing the suspension of disbelief) and the complete lack of surprise (invincible heroine). Still, it's not every day you get to see a super-cool heroine with unlimited powers and perfect control. That alone makes the movie is worth seeing. DYBAD (talk) 10:13, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Here is something that might bring you good cheer: BeyonderGod is blocked from all Wikia sites. All the ones he created are now decomissioned. Looks like he never really learned from all the times he has been banned or disiplined on other Wikias for his harassing behavior. I for one am glad he is gone, hopefully the block is permanent. Thought I'd share. Cheers. Nausiated (talk) 01:46, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
Hey CoolCat ! I gave up the storytelling for my character (much harder and more demanding that I thought), so feel free to use it in your story (but no nerfing / plot-induced stupidity please ^ ^;). Could be usuful for plot coupons or godzilla thresholds, notably, or just some balanced contribution. Your call ! Just thought I'd give you the ok since I was quite protective until now. DYBAD (talk) 08:10, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
The problem with Superpower Manipulation and its variants it makes everything else irrelevant. When you can create superpowers, you don't need to explore, learn, work or gain. Want something ? Create a power for it. Solved. A total drive killer... My character does have a form of power creation/augmentation/alteration, but it requires existing templates, in-depth analysis and proportional resources, which in turn motivates him to explore, learn and work. I'm not sure about the narrative usefullness of an independent ability creator. DYBAD (talk) 03:40, October 18, 2014 (UTC)
Superpower Drug Lord ? Now, that's an interesting concept ^ ^ Only being able to manpulate others' power seems the ideal limitation. Though if he can create powers, he could easily raise an army of superhumans via built-in fail-safes, like auto-deactivation in the empowered character doesn't follow his instructions or turn on him. DYBAD (talk) 04:34, October 18, 2014 (UTC)