Because most of it was just copied and pasted from Omnipotence and there is nothing above Omnipotence. It is not Omnipotence if there is something that can transcend above it.Besides, I think there is enough "versions" of Omnipotence as it is Gabriel456 (talk) 21:26, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
friend, with all due respect
you created the power?
Tell me about the omnipotent hand, What she transcends? what is its nature?
I enjoyed this power, so I want to know
Hey CoolBat ^ ^ There's a big post of mine about various TV tropes pages waiting for you on the Alpha Physiology page when you'll have some time, if you wish to answer of course. DYBAD (talk) 20:55, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
For Science ! ^ ^
Life Aspect Manifestation
From personal experience I can say that it's so easy to go overly verbose when you get interested about the subject, so you're welcome.
Try to take a step back after you've written something and consider how someone else who isn't really that interested would see it, and especially if it is so long that they don't even bother reading; there's a reason why we keep breaking, shortening or removing the walls of text when they appear. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:37, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
Death Aspect Manifestation
hey buddy, remember the power that you created and deleted: Almighty hand
tell me the theory where did you get that, I need, the philosophical theory, pass me the link
What the theory
A compromise between power, balance and long-term fun. Enjoy ^ ^
Just So I Know
Hey CoolCat, do you by any chance have a YouTube account?
I need advice
Minerva's War God Magic
Hey, I am planning to make a power based on Minerva's War God Magic (Fairy Tail) but I am trying to understand the magic.
All I understand is the applications to Minerva's magic is that is can remotely teleport any object or oneself.
Sap away at one's magical energy.
Summon a giant six armed monster.
She even says it's some sort of territorial magic.
If you're interested
I was just doing a favor or what not. But here's a story of an AU Harry Potter. Just check it and give a chance. Sorry if I look like some dude selling a product. But I can't help it right now. Chaw! Addikhabbo (talk) 03:35, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
Answering this will get you additional questions.
If you were given in a situation, involving 500 passengers of two ships, 300 on 1 and 200 on the other, both sinking, and you had time to save only one, which would you save?
Your only options are to pick a boat to save. You don't have time to transfer passengers from one boat to another. Doing so will cause further death.
State your reason.
After saving 300 passengers on Boat A, the situation repeats itself and people transfer to lifeboats, 200 on L 1 and 100 on L 2. You can only save one L.
Again, you can't choose something other than the option given to you, as taking a 3rd option will result in increasing casualties.
If you've figured out the logic between my questions, give them to me.
If you keep editing various Elemental Manipulations Limitations, I must insist you do the same change on all EM pages. I'm not interested going through the annoyance myself, so if you start chancing the given form, please do all the same way. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:20, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
Hi ! May I ask your help for the Capability section of the QM page ? You're clearly the most skilled of us in this area, and I'm sure you could bring to light the power's inherent awesomeness (sorely underrated since its creation). DYBAD (talk) 01:45, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year
- "Happy New Year! Today 2 person ask me about u. I gave them your details and contact. They will b looking 4 u soon. Their names are Mr HAPPINESS and Ms LUCK. Happy New Year! "
Hi CoolCat ! I have a question for a scientific mind : what is causality beyond the abstract theory ? I know what Probability Manipulation is like in practice, it essentially "pushes" existing phenomena into one specific path among all those it could take, but I have a much harder time to picture Causality Manipulation from an empirical viewpoint. Could you help me try to sort out this enigma ? DYBAD (talk) 03:07, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
Given his completely unreasonable, logic proof, uncompromising, and idiotically offensive behaviour, I suspect more and more that he is a troll having a go with us and this wiki. Would you like to ask the admins to ban him, as he is getting extremely tiresome to have to deal with, and I think they would listen more to a massive contributor suçh as yourself. Antvasima (talk) 06:26, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
It is the relentless unreasonable crude language trolling that gets to me. But if you suspect that he uses multiple identities, perhaps you should make it known to the admins? Antvasima (talk) 04:51, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
I want the admin to ban you to Antvasima but I aint Disrespectful like you and yeah I have another account ._. Soooo what? Haven't edit on this wiki in a long time with that account so please if you have a direct problem then talk to me about it k? Beyonder (talk) 06:06, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Yes you have been relentlessly wantonly crude language trolling, unreasonable, and insulting. It is easy to see this in your past posts, and I am not the only one who thinks so. If you stop being in your face provocative against me I have no problem with you however. Antvasima (talk) 08:28, August 15, 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for being a jerk to you the other day. Was too -condition here- for an argument and didn't get any sleep. My bad. Shouldn't have gotten angry at you. Addikhabbo (talk) 11:35, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
I didn't really want to get into this, but I locked the page, just until you two reach an agreement. But I probably won't be on much longer (near-midnight for me), so you'll have to rely on Kuopiofi. Gabriel456 (talk) 02:32, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
Reminder to both
Apparently it must be repeated every time someone starts argument about OP: keep it on Talk/Forum/whatever, don't go chancing the page repeatedly over the same thing. It's right on the rules and repeated several times on OP's Comments
I'm seriously starting to think making this block-worthy rule for repeat offenders, it's getting so annoying.
And please, for the sake of my blood-pressure and mental health, try to figure it out like thinking/rational beings between yourself instead of drawing other people to this. In other words, don't contact me until you've find agreement and hold to it, I'm getting so sick/tired about this. --Kuopiofi (talk) 04:46, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
It happens to everyone, this OP-argument just seems to have drawn the most passionate responses in a long time... don't know if it's BG, the power in question (OP has caused a row few times) or just something that's been waiting to happen and this was the opening to it, or all at once. --Kuopiofi (talk) 10:22, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
Even if I agreed, I can't. I'm not a bureaucrat (or whatever the term is). Neither is Kuopiofi. The only one that is was Kingsman, but he hasn't been on for atleast a year Gabriel456 (talk) 01:13, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
I wouldn't be so quick to wish him good luck with it, as he in no way or form has any good intentions. He strictly seems to have created it to piss lots of people off by posting extremely inaccurate information about various characters, literally laughingly gloat about being able to get away with plagiarising the real OBD and lie about being the original owner, and to promote his namesake favourite character. He never ever listens to proof or reason, and would rather edit war indefinitely. He said that he considers it acceptable to level death threats against me. Antvasima (talk) 05:09, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate Monkey D. Garp's strength that was cultivated without the use of a Devil Fruit or magic, but by his own will and the abilities that are naturally available to him as a human.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 12:45, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Nuclear fission and law of conservation
Hey CoolCat ! I was wondering about the relation between the massive energy produced by nuclear fission and the conservation of mass/energy. I mean, if the breaking of such minuscule things can produce such great quantities of energy, isn't this law of conservation kind of violated somehow? DYBAD (talk) 03:56, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
So basically, nuclear fission doesn't violate the conservation of mass/energy, but simply illustrates the extremely unbalanced ratio mass/energy ratio, microscopic amounts of mass effectively holding enormous amounts of energy. Correct ? DYBAD (talk) 08:40, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
So every human being is basically a nuclear bomb in waiting ? Nice ! The guy who eventually finds the button would have the entire world in the palm of his hand. I'm sure it would make for an awesome movie about the dangers of science and human responsability, on a background of terrorist threat and power play. Just like the original nuclear bomb, but with 7 billions walking bombs all over the world waiting the right signal. Blockbuster material here ! I wish there was a site to suggest movie scenarios to potential producers ^ ^ DYBAD (talk) 15:37, September 28, 2014 (UTC)
Well, the Lucy 2014 movies was a huge success despite being entirely built on completely incorrect theory (even the producer openly acknowledges it), so I'm sure a "humans turned into walking nuclear bombs via a modified fission process" scenario would have the audience jumping in without a second thought, especially considering the real-life nuclear threat and human bombs terrorism. DYBAD (talk) 01:43, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Funny though how Lucy threw both realism (100% brain capacity) and balance (unlimited superpowers) out the window, and still became a huge success. I get the feeling most people just want to dream when they go watch a movie. DYBAD (talk) 02:29, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
The Lucy movie is actually a strange combination of good and bad. On the good, Lucy's exponentially awesome abilities. On the bad side, the nonesensical basis repeated at least a dozen times (atomizing the suspension of disbelief) and the complete lack of surprise (invincible heroine). Still, it's not every day you get to see a super-cool heroine with unlimited powers and perfect control. That alone makes the movie is worth seeing. DYBAD (talk) 10:13, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Here is something that might bring you good cheer: BeyonderGod is blocked from all Wikia sites. All the ones he created are now decomissioned. Looks like he never really learned from all the times he has been banned or disiplined on other Wikias for his harassing behavior. I for one am glad he is gone, hopefully the block is permanent. Thought I'd share. Cheers. Nausiated (talk) 01:46, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
Hey CoolCat ! I gave up the storytelling for my character (much harder and more demanding that I thought), so feel free to use it in your story (but no nerfing / plot-induced stupidity please ^ ^;). Could be usuful for plot coupons or godzilla thresholds, notably, or just some balanced contribution. Your call ! Just thought I'd give you the ok since I was quite protective until now. DYBAD (talk) 08:10, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
The problem with Superpower Manipulation and its variants it makes everything else irrelevant. When you can create superpowers, you don't need to explore, learn, work or gain. Want something ? Create a power for it. Solved. A total drive killer... My character does have a form of power creation/augmentation/alteration, but it requires existing templates, in-depth analysis and proportional resources, which in turn motivates him to explore, learn and work. I'm not sure about the narrative usefullness of an independent ability creator. DYBAD (talk) 03:40, October 18, 2014 (UTC)
Superpower Drug Lord ? Now, that's an interesting concept ^ ^ Only being able to manpulate others' power seems the ideal limitation. Though if he can create powers, he could easily raise an army of superhumans via built-in fail-safes, like auto-deactivation in the empowered character doesn't follow his instructions or turn on him. DYBAD (talk) 04:34, October 18, 2014 (UTC)
its grant look!! :)
hey cool cat lool i made my first page http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Grant.walker/my_first_character how do like it if you do comment and spread it around
http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:TheRavageBeast/Character_sheet_Experiment_1.0 TheRavageBeast (talk) 17:04, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Heir to the Stars is a published book
Actually it is a official works, all of his books have an ISBN, and only published works have ISBNs. So Heir to the Stars is an a official published work. So it fits. if you don't believe me read this- http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/7187143-clarification-for-the-fans
DOTA: Fundamental Forces Embodiment
It says on Ezalor's page that he and the other fundamentals were originally bound together as one being called the primordial harmony, but he separated from that group and thus caused the other fundamentals to be separated as well. So they were originally all one being- "Ezalor long ago escaped the Fundamental plane, separating from the other ancient forces to which he was bound within the great Primordial harmony" the four fundamentals were originally one being before Ezalor separated from the group.SageM (talk) 03:37, October 26, 2014 (UTC)SageM
On the DOTA wiki its lists there powers as each of the four forces, Enigma represents gravity, Io represents Electromagnetism, Ezalor represents the Weak Force, and Chaos Knight the Strong force. "Enigma, Io, Keeper of the Light and Chaos Knight together represent the four fundamental forces of the universe with Chaos Knight representing the strong nuclear force. This is reflected in several of Enigma's responses to these heroes."
Page Idea: Omnipotence Authority/Ruler
Hi, I was thinking of the power you mentioned earlier, Transcend Omnipotence, instead of that name how about Omnipotence Authority/Ruler? The Power to Rule over other Omnipotent Beings(which is basically what the Ace of Spades is, a being so powerful that he is the ruler and master of other Omnipotent/Supreme Beings.) What do you think of that idea for a page?SageM (talk) 05:30, October 27, 2014 (UTC)SageM
The user of Omnipotence embodiment as defined as being the very power of omnipotence itself(with a bit of theft nullification thrown in since the power cannot be cut off, stolen or copied) Omnipotence Authority on the other hand is a state above that, which gives you the power to command or tell they these all powerful beings what to do with no repercussions, the user with this power is not defined by the terms of omnipotence, Omnipotence embodiment has command of all other omnipotent powers, but not other omnipotent beings themselves, from what I have read of the power its like a evolved form of Absolute Existence. Omnipotent Authority allows you to command other Omnipotent embodiments
lets put it this way, Author Authority has you as the supreme being able to rule your definition of existence right? Well Omnipotence Authority is like the Publisher of the book then, The author may write everything that happens in the book and can tell everyone what to do, but the Publisher is the one who has final say on whether or not the book will ever see the light of day. the Publisher is the one who can command the Author of any book.
Here are some other names for this power-
- Ace of Spades
- Omnipotence Ruler
- Publisher Authority
I had to change the idea of this power a little in order for me to post it on the site, because of that I decided to just call the power Publisher Authority, the power to command Author Authority level beings, that way it probably won't get deleted if its posted.
Because not everything on the computer is accurate especially on wikipedia which almost anyone can edit. Not that I'm saying that wikipedia is not a good source, but it's not as reliable as a library book. since some online pages may not have every little detail about the subject matter. It's like looking up symptoms of an illness you think you have but you don't. And the book is not old, it's reletively new. It's rudimentary to know that every site is different and may have different information for the same subject. Some may be accurate and some may not, nobody really checks the credibility of a site and shut down unless its on a site that has a professor or an expert on the subject as an admin.Squidbaby (talk) 18:01, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
All I'm trying to say is that it's simple that if flower manipulation can manipulate leaves then why not vines. Flowers can produce and grow on vines depending on the flower. Some flowers grow on other plants while others are independant. Not every flower is the same so you cant just assume that a flower manipulator cant manipulate vines. That is something everyone knows or should know. He got his information on just one page while there are other pages on wikipedia and pictures on the internet that proves that I'm right. I'm sure you have been in a school before so you should know that students rely on more than ONE BOOK on a subject matter they are studying.Squidbaby (talk) 19:04, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
I was just frustrated at him because he keeps undoing my edits (which what i put is valid). I was PO'd that he keeps doing that over and over with almost every other page i edit and he only relies on one page from wikipedia instead of researching the powers all together. I didn't mean to sound like a jerk, I'm sorry too.Squidbaby (talk) 19:53, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:TheRavageBeast/Character_Sheet_Anti-God TheRavageBeast (talk) 20:57, November 3, 2014 (UTC)
TheRavageBeast (talk) 09:14, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
My new sheet enjoy
http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:GodOfNerds/Character_Sheet_XXIV You might find the outcome of the final battle there *wink*
Chat now. Please!
Hey CoolCat ! Are you still interested in writing the "Alliance" story ? I'm quite sure you'd make a much version than me tweaking Deathwish's (I just suck as a narrator ^ ^;), and now you confirmed Lawrence's omni-ness would be respected, I would love to read your take on the story. DYBAD (talk) 06:13, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
Alone with the madman awaits the secret to eternity,the eternity of loneliness and the constant spiral that is madness.What define madness,is it the unpredictability? the serenity of being unrestricted?or merely letting instincts over morality take over. Sifsand (talk) 07:37, January 8, 2015 (UTC)
James Power: antimatter transmutation
CoolCat123450, I had an idea which is an alternate take on the concept of Omnipotence. Whenever you find it convenient, please look up my thread. I would love to hear the opinion of a senior member like yourself, since you make proper analytical judgements.
Check out my new blog regarding powerlevels
Truth 15:28, March 24, 2015 (UTC)Truth™
Your sure to love my new CS :)
Why did you insult me? I didn't do anything to you. You're too rude...
If it wouldn't be too much trouble,whenever you finish Avery's story I have another one in mind.This one involves Dawson hunting down a Rathalos,be sure to include the details on how he acts and how competent of a hunter he is. MisterCornGuy (talk) 12:16, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
If they are Users of those powers, they belong to there. If there are pictures that are added, it doesn't matter if there are many, as long as those pic are about users.
(eye-roll) You do realize that this site isn't about which Users/verse dominate it? Users is about those who have those powers, no matter which series they belong. If you can say for certain that they don't have those powers, feel free to remove them. If they do have those powers, return them and the pics. --Kuopiofi (talk) 16:45, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
If it's one of the Common powers which have hundreds or even thousands Users, just mentioning few of the major Users/verse works for me. But you've been removing them from even the Powers where they were only Users.
Please return them to Powers have no Users, maybe also those that are Rare. I don't really mind about the Common powers in this area, but Powers that have no or very few Users just because you didn't like the series... --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:06, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
There was at least one page where that only user was of VC and even the main pic was removed, just checking: you're sure they weren't user?
About the pics, that's mainly because people are lazy and the one who posted VC pics has been pretty active about it. I've posted few every now and then, but that amounts something like few dozen at most this year. --Kuopiofi (talk) 17:18, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
hey CoolCat,i need to say something about VC cards powers,actually,when,i don't only see their English Description on the English version of the game,i also see their Chinese Description,because sometimes,the cards descriptions are very differents from the english ones,for example,on the enlgish Description,Nyx is stated to be:Night Governing Goddess of Genesis (Origin),and on the Chinese:The Primordial Goddess of Night. or Harihara,that is Only Stated to be Goddess of Creation on the english description,but on the chinese is stated to be Goddess of Creation And Destruction,Other great example is Angra Mainyu,that on the English version is stated to be just a demon who controls the stars,on the Chinese she is:Evil God monarch of the universe.has Absolute control of the "evil", and things in the world of "good" to do right. Its sole purpose is to kill all existence, destroy everything. and some cards that are stated to be Goddess on the chinese version (The majority of the goddess there has the Word:Goddess before their names.) that are not stated to be on the english version .It is because that that use or merge both descriptions,so don't worry if you see some cards that are im powers that the english description don't say anything. L12345 (talk) 17:46, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
and sorry for the Overwhelming number of VC images in some powers.such as the power of Roman Deity Physiology,who is the number that you think that is sufficient? 2,3 or etc?,i think that 3 or at least 4 are sufficient.but you doesn't needed to remove them as users of the powers,only remove most the images of the powers that they where most overwhelming (such as Roman Deity Physiology) but not all of them,or at least,leave 2,3 or 4 of the users of VC. L12345 (talk) 19:38, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
it's ok,i recognize that some pags was with to much imgs and users,but i want to ask,why you removed users and imgs from powers that was only 2 users from VC? since its not even close from overwhelming (i think that overwhelming is about 7 and more imgs) and alsoif i don't mistake, some powers you removed all users from VC? L12345 (talk) 20:13, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
well,you will undo most of the edits,or you want me to do it for chose the users who would stay on thee powers where they where to much? (and about power manifestation? can i leave all of them? since there are several users from several verses on both,users and imgs?) L12345 (talk) 20:33, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
well,from which power you want to start?well,and what about you undo the ones you removed from pages where they minus them 5 users,and the ones that you undo with more,leave to me to see the one i will leave.ok? L12345 (talk) 20:40, May 31, 2015 (UTC)
so you could say that someone who outdo causality is not bound by any cause or effect,being able to make any effect without a cause or any cause without a effect? or it is not anything like that? L12345 (talk) 00:26, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
Rules for this wiki: 7. Don't change the page-name unless you have a very good reason, we have Also Called for a reason.
- 7a. If you change the name, it's your job to change the links for that power. Use this to find the old links.
Finally completed and finished a character! Personally my favorite of my projects, so I really hope you'll check it out and enjoy it ^ ^
definitely. either way, check out Zenon when you have the time. finally finished up his personality and storyline. (a comment wouldn't hurt, too :^) )
It is not a matter of intelligence, it is a matter of emotions. Fiction is about fantasies, and people simply care more about satisfaction than credibility. That is the reason why the least credible power is also the most popular, and considering fiction is mostly about escapism, it's a perfectly understandable choice.
Personally, I need a reasonable balance between the two due to a weaker suspension of disbelief, though aiming for the ultimate level naturally requires relative compromises to work, though always it a way that can stand questioning.
Uncontributive comments deleted by the way. Better let this fruitless argument behind, nothing good will come out of it.
At least that's your take on the matter ;) As Lawrence illustrated, viewpoints can vary greatly.
The Monotheistic part refered to the general almigthiness and unquestioned invincibility that all such deities have in common, and that are a quintessential part of Cassius. Lawrence's invincibility on the other hand is very specific, and immersively explained as an inevitable consequence of his unique nature (AR quote : "But how could one defeat such a being ? Wouldn't anything you threw at him become a weapon in his own defense ?"). His polyvalent capabilities are also the consequence of the very creative use of his main ability and the learning of new ones, rather than the power to simply impose your will upon the world (Reality Warping in its various forms). So very unlike Monotheistic archetypes.
All things considered, it's probably just my timeless disbelief of Omnipotence that is showing (goes way before character sheets, back to my very first power and even before I became a registered user). And with so many major cosmic powers eventually found wanting (including top-level abstracts), I just can't help doubting.
I'm not restarting the argument, just sharing the thoughts and feel that unfortunately lead to it.
I'm not forcing anything upon ayone, I'm merely explaining my take on the matter. As I said time and again, everyone is free to believe or not, and it goes for your take as much as mine. And truth be told, you may not be in any place to pull the Suggs "ad hominen" un-argument left and right, considering you're doing pretty much the same thing in your own way ^ ^; DYBAD (talk) 07:44, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Cat, rejoin the chat, please.
When you are undoing what someone has done, the least you can do is provide an explanation for why, that's just common decency (Or however you put it in English.)
To not even bother to take a few seconds out of your life to explain why, is just plain rude.